Add a sentinel check to require a second explicit confirmation if the
user is attempting to upload (or upload --replace) an unusually large
number of commits. This may help the user to catch an accidentally
incorrect rebase they had done previously.
Change-Id: I12c4d102f90a631d6ad193486a70ffd520ef6ae0
This gives the user the last chance to confirm where the change is
going to be sent to. Knowing the review server URL will help the
user decide if continuing with the upload makes sense.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
If the user has disabled a prompt, skip the two commands we use to
obtain the list of commits and the date of the branch. These will
never be displayed and just waste the end-user's time.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
If review.URL.autoupload is set to true in a project's .git/config
or in ~/.gitconfig then `repo upload` will automatically upload,
and skip prompting the end-user.
Conversely, if review.URL.autoupload is set to false, then repo
will refuse to upload to that project.
Bug: REPO-25
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
Modern Gerrit2 automatically outputs the URL for each commit to
stderr as it creates the records. Dumping the URL ourselves is
unnecessary additional output, and worse is just an approximate
guess for the correct web URL. Gerrit might not live at the top
level directory for the server, or might even prefer a different
hostname for web connections than what is listed in the manifest.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
Gerrit won't permit more than one commit using the same change
number during a replacement request, so we should error out if
the user has asked for this in their upload edit script.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
Users are prompted with the list of known changes we are about
to upload, and they can fill out the current change numbers for
any changes which already exist in the data store. For each of
those changes the change number and commit id is sent as part of
the upload request, so Gerrit can insert the new commit as a new
patch set of the existing change, rather than make a new change.
This facility permits developers to replace a patch so they can
address comments made on a prior version of the same change.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
This way users are well aware of which account we used when the
uploads are complete, so they can be certain to sign into the web
application with that user identity.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>