Several messages are printed with the `print` method and the message
is split across two lines, i.e.:
print('This is a message split'
'across two source code lines')
Which causes the message to be printed as:
This is a message splitacross two source code lines
Add a space at the end of the first line before the line break:
print('This is a message split '
'across two source code lines'
Also correct a minor spelling mistake.
Change-Id: Ib98d93fcfb98d78f48025fcc428b6661380cff79
`repo cherry-pick` was broken because we were referencing stderr
instead of sys.stderr. This should fix it.
Change-Id: I67f25c3a0790d029edc65732c319df7c684546c8
manifest_xml: import `HEAD` and `R_HEADS` from correct module
version: import `HEAD` from correct module
`HEAD` and `R_HEADS` should be imported from the git_refs module,
where they are originally defined, rather than from the project
module.
repo: remove unused import of readline
cherry_pick: import standard modules on separate lines
smartsync: import subcmd modules explicitly from subcmd
Use:
`import re
import sys`
and
`from subcmds.sync import Sync`
Instead of:
`import sys, re`
and
`from sync import Sync`
Change-Id: Ie10dd6832710939634c4f5c86b9ba5a9cd6fc92e
It is undesired to have the same Change-Id:-line for two separate
commits, and when cherry-picking, the user must manually change it.
If this is not done, bad things may happen (such as when the user
is uploading the cherry-picked commit to Gerrit, it will instead
see it as a new patch-set for the original change, or worse).
repo cherry-pick works the same was as git cherry-pick, except that
it replaces the Change-Id with a new one and adds a reference
back to the commit from where it was picked.
On failures (when git can not successfully apply the cherry-picked
commit), instructions will be written to the user.
Change-Id: I5a38b89839f91848fad43386d43cae2f6cdabf83
