Rather than erase the entire line first then print out the new content,
print out the new content on top of the old and then erase anything we
didn't update. This should result in a lot less flashing with faster
terminals.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/11293
Change-Id: Ie2920b0bf3d5e6f920b8631a1c406444b23cd12d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/335214
Reviewed-by: LaMont Jones <lamontjones@google.com>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
We want progress bars in the default output mode, but not when the
user specifies --quiet. Add a setting to the Progress bar class so
it takes care of not displaying anything itself rather than having
to update every subcommand to conditionally setup & call the object.
Change-Id: I1134993bffc5437bc22e26be11a512125f10597f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/303225
Reviewed-by: Raman Tenneti <rtenneti@google.com>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
This avoids GIL limitations with using threads for parallel processing.
This reworks the fetch logic to return results for processing in the
main thread instead of leaving every thread to do its own processing.
We have to tweak the chunking logic a little here because multiprocessing
favors batching over returning immediate results when using a larger value
for chunksize. When a single job can be quite slow, this tradeoff is not
good UX.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/12389
Change-Id: I0f0512d15ad7332d1eb28aff52c29d378acc9e1d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/298642
Reviewed-by: Chris Mcdonald <cjmcdonald@google.com>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
We're already keeping tracking of the start time, so might as
well use it to display overall execution time for steps.
Change-Id: Ib4cf8b2b0dfcdf7b776a84295d59cc569971bdf5
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/298482
Reviewed-by: Michael Mortensen <mmortensen@google.com>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
The idea for skipping some progress updates was to avoid spending
too much time on the progress bar itself. Unfortunately, for large
projects (100s if not 1000s) of repos, we get into the situation
with large/slow checkouts that we skip showing updates when a repo
finishes, but not enough repos finished to increase the percent.
Since the progress bar should be relatively fast compared to the
actual network & local dick operations, have it show an update
whenever the caller requests it. A test with ~1000 repos shows
that the progress bar in total adds <100ms.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/11293
Change-Id: I708a0c4bd923c59c7691a5b48ae33eb6fca4cd14
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/297903
Reviewed-by: Michael Mortensen <mmortensen@google.com>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
- E301 expected 1 blank line
- E302 expected 2 blank lines
- E303 too many blank lines
- E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition
- E306 expected 1 blank line before a nested definition
Fixed automatically with autopep8:
git ls-files | grep py$ | xargs autopep8 --in-place \
--select E301,E302,E303,E305,E306
Manually fix issues in project.py caused by misuse of block comments.
Change-Id: Iee840fcaff48aae504ddac9c3e76d2acd484f6a9
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/254599
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Tested-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
- E121 continuation line under-indented for hanging indent
- E122 continuation line missing indentation or outdented
- E125 continuation line with same indent as next logical line
- E126 continuation line over-indented for hanging indent
- E127 continuation line over-indented for visual indent
- E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
- E129 visually indented line with same indent as next logical line
- E131 continuation line unaligned for hanging indent
Fixed automatically with autopep8:
git ls-files | grep py$ | xargs autopep8 --in-place \
--select E121,E122,E125,E126,E127,E128,E129,E131
Change-Id: Ifd95fb8e6a1a4d6e9de187b5787d64a6326dd249
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/254605
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Tested-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
The current sync output displays "Fetching project" and "Checking out
project" messages and progress bar updates independently leading to a
lot of spam. Lets merge these periodic outputs with the status bar to
get a little bit tighter output in the normal case. This doesn't solve
all our problems, but gets us closer.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/11293
Change-Id: Icd627830af4dd934a9355b7ace754b56dc96cfef
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/244934
Reviewed-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
When displaying progress bars, we use \r to reset the cursor to the
start of the line before showing the new update. This assumes the
new line will fully erase whatever was displayed there previously.
The "done" codepath tries to handle this by including a few extra
spaces at the end of the message to "white out" what was there.
Lets replace that hack with the standard ECMA escape sequence that
clears the current line completely. This is the CSI "erase in line"
sequence that the terminal will use to delete all content. The \r
is still needed to move the cursor to the start of the line. Using
this sequence should be OK since we're already assuming the terminal
is ECMA compliant with our use of coloring sequences. We also put
the \r after the CSI sequence on the off chance the terminal can't
process it and displays a few bytes of garbage.
The other improvement is to the syncbuffer API. When it dumps its
status information, it almost always comes after a progress bar
update which leads to confusing comingled output. Something like:
Fetching projects: 100% (2/2) error: src/platform2/: branch ...
Since the progress bar is "throw away", have the syncbuffer reset
the current output to the start of the line before showing whatever
messages it has queued.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/11293
Change-Id: I6544d073fe993d98ee7e91fca5e501ba5fecfe4c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/236615
Reviewed-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
There is a standard Python "trace" module, so having a local trace.py
prevents us being able to import that. Rename the module to avoid.
Change-Id: I23e29ec95a2204bb168a641323d05e76968d9b57
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/234832
Reviewed-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
There's no reason to support any other encoding in these files.
This only affects the files themselves and not streams they open.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/10418
Change-Id: I053cb40cd3666ce5c8a0689b9dd938f24ca765bf
This allows our progress meter to be used for bytes transferred, by
setting the units to KB or MB to let the user know the size.
Change-Id: Ie8653d4a40d79439026c18bd51915845b2c5bba9
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
Avoids logging progress data into cron logs, etc.
Suggested-by: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Change-Id: I4eefa2c282f0ca0a95a0185612b52e2146669e4c
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
The point of the progress meter is to let the user know that the
task is progressing, and give them a chance to estimate when it will
be complete. If the task completes in under 0.5 seconds then it
is sufficiently fast enough that the user doesn't need to be kept
up-to-date on its progress; in fact showing the meter may just slow
the task down waiting on the tty to redraw.
We now delay the progress meter 0.5 seconds (or 1 second if the
Python time.time() function isn't accurate enough) to avoid any
really fast tasks, like a no-op local sync.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
The trace output often interfers with the progress meter, so its
easier to just disable the progress meter if trace is active.
Its already verbose enough to let the user know we are working,
which is all the progress meter is there for anyway.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
If there are no projects to fetch, the progress meter would
have divided by zero during `repo sync`, and that throws a
ZeroDivisionError. Instead we report the progress with an
unknown amount remaining.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
This way users can see how much is left during fetch. Its
especially useful when most syncs are no-ops but there are
hundreds of repositories to poll.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
