- E301 expected 1 blank line
- E302 expected 2 blank lines
- E303 too many blank lines
- E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition
- E306 expected 1 blank line before a nested definition
Fixed automatically with autopep8:
git ls-files | grep py$ | xargs autopep8 --in-place \
--select E301,E302,E303,E305,E306
Manually fix issues in project.py caused by misuse of block comments.
Change-Id: Iee840fcaff48aae504ddac9c3e76d2acd484f6a9
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/254599
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Tested-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
A common pattern in our subcommands is to verify the arguments &
options before executing things. For some subcommands, that check
stage is quite long which makes the execution function even bigger.
Lets split that logic out of the execute phase so it's easier to
manage these.
This is most noticeable in the sync subcommand whose Execute func
is quite large, and the option checking makes up ~15% of it.
The manifest command's Execute can be simplified significantly as
the optparse configuration always sets output_file to a string.
Change-Id: I7097847ff040e831345e63de6b467ee17609990e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/234834
Reviewed-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
There's no reason to support any other encoding in these files.
This only affects the files themselves and not streams they open.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/10418
Change-Id: I053cb40cd3666ce5c8a0689b9dd938f24ca765bf
After performing the actual cherry-pick operation, the code
in cherry_pick.py opens a pipe to 'git commit -F' to rewrite the commit
message, emits the fixed-up commit msg to the pipe, then waits
for 'git commit' to complete. The child 'git' process winds up
hanging while reading from the pipe, however, since the parent
process still has it open. To fix the hang, change the parent process
to close its end of the pipe after it has emitted the message.
Change-Id: I5929371e69a5b076f09009d00d40a2c72ac8ac33
Several messages are printed with the `print` method and the message
is split across two lines, i.e.:
print('This is a message split'
'across two source code lines')
Which causes the message to be printed as:
This is a message splitacross two source code lines
Add a space at the end of the first line before the line break:
print('This is a message split '
'across two source code lines'
Also correct a minor spelling mistake.
Change-Id: Ib98d93fcfb98d78f48025fcc428b6661380cff79
`repo cherry-pick` was broken because we were referencing stderr
instead of sys.stderr. This should fix it.
Change-Id: I67f25c3a0790d029edc65732c319df7c684546c8
manifest_xml: import `HEAD` and `R_HEADS` from correct module
version: import `HEAD` from correct module
`HEAD` and `R_HEADS` should be imported from the git_refs module,
where they are originally defined, rather than from the project
module.
repo: remove unused import of readline
cherry_pick: import standard modules on separate lines
smartsync: import subcmd modules explicitly from subcmd
Use:
`import re
import sys`
and
`from subcmds.sync import Sync`
Instead of:
`import sys, re`
and
`from sync import Sync`
Change-Id: Ie10dd6832710939634c4f5c86b9ba5a9cd6fc92e
It is undesired to have the same Change-Id:-line for two separate
commits, and when cherry-picking, the user must manually change it.
If this is not done, bad things may happen (such as when the user
is uploading the cherry-picked commit to Gerrit, it will instead
see it as a new patch-set for the original change, or worse).
repo cherry-pick works the same was as git cherry-pick, except that
it replaces the Change-Id with a new one and adds a reference
back to the commit from where it was picked.
On failures (when git can not successfully apply the cherry-picked
commit), instructions will be written to the user.
Change-Id: I5a38b89839f91848fad43386d43cae2f6cdabf83
