This option allows the user to specify a manifest server to use when
syncing. This manifest server will provide a manifest pegging each
project to a known green build. This allows developers to work on a
known good tree that is known to build and pass tests, preventing
failed builds to hamper productivity.
The manifest used is not "sticky" so as to allow subsequent
'repo sync' calls to sync to the tip of the tree.
Change-Id: Id0a24ece20f5a88034ad364b416a1dd2e394226d
These aren't that widely used, and actually make it difficult for
users to fully mirror a forest of repositories, and then permit
someone else to clone off that forest, rather then the original
upstream servers.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
With the <remove-project> element we can remove projects, and
fully replace them with a different definition. So this note
is out of date.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
The manifest files now permit removing a project so the user can
either keep it out of their client, or replace it with a different
project using an entirely different configuration.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
This way users can add forks they know about to an existing project
that was already declared in the primary manifest. This is mostly
useful with the Linux kernel project, where multiple forks is quite
common for the main upstream tree (e.g. Linus' tree), a platform
architecture tree (e.g. ARM) and a device specific tree (e.g. the
msm7k tree used by Android).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
By setting a project-name on a remote nested within a project forks
of a project like the Linux kernel can be easily handled by fetching
all relevant forks into the same client side project under different
remote names. Developers can create branches off different remotes
using `git checkout --track -b $myname $remote/$branch` and later
`repo upload` automatically redirects to the proper fork project
in the code review server.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <sop@google.com>
