flake8 reports:
F811 redefinition of unused 'test_src_block_dir' from line 259
which is caused by having two methods with the same name. Rename
them both to better desribe their purpose.
Change-Id: If7612a42001776d71bb1a6a80fc631d3d262e6ce
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/254449
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Tested-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
Some Android/Nest manifests are using <linkfile> with src="." to
create stable paths to specific projects. Allow that specific
use case as it seems reasonable to support.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/11218
Change-Id: I16dbe8d9fe42ea45440afcb61404c753bff1930d
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/254330
Reviewed-by: Chanho Park <parkch98@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Reject paths in <copyfile> & <linkfile> that try to use symlinks or
non-file or non-dirs.
We don't fully validate <linkfile> when src is a glob as it's a bit
complicated -- any component in the src could be the glob. We make
sure the destination is a directory, and that any paths in that dir
are created as symlinks. So while this can be used to read any path,
it can't be abused to write to any paths.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/11218
Change-Id: I68b6d789b5ca4e43f569e75e8b293b3e13d3224b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/233074
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mortensen <mmortensen@google.com>
Series of steps:
* Create a local "b1" branch with `repo start b1` that tracks a remote
branch (totally fine)
* Manually create a local "b2" branch with `git branch --track b1 b2`
that tracks the local "b1" (uh-oh...)
* Delete the local "b1" branch manually or via `repo prune` (....)
* Try to process the "b2" branch with `repo prune`
Since b2 tracks a branch that no longer exists, everything blows up
at this point as we try to probe the non-existent ref. Instead, we
should flag this as unknown and leave it up to the user to resolve.
This probably could come up if a local branch was tracking a remote
branch that was deleted from the server, and users ran something like
`repo sync --prune` which cleaned up the remote refs.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/11485
Change-Id: I6b6b6041943944b8efa6e2ad0b8b10f13a75a5c2
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/236793
Reviewed-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
Reviewed-by: Kirtika Ruchandani <kirtika@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
As we convert repo to support Python 3, the version of Python that we
use might not be the version that repo hooks users have written for.
Since repo upgrades are not immediate, and not easily under direct
control of end users (relative to the projects maintaining the hook
code), allow hook authors to declare the version of Python that they
want to use.
Now repo will read the shebang from the hook script and compare it
against the version of Python repo itself is running under. If they
differ, we'll try to execute a separate instance of Python and have
it load & execute the hook. If things are compatible, then we still
use the inprocess execution logic that we have today.
This allows repo hook users to upgrade on their own schedule (they
could even upgrade to Python 3 ahead of us) without having to worry
about their supported version being exactly in sync with repo's.
Bug: https://crbug.com/gerrit/10418
Change-Id: I97c7c96b64fb2ee465c39b90e9bdcc76394a146a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/c/git-repo/+/228432
Reviewed-by: David Pursehouse <dpursehouse@collab.net>
Tested-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@google.com>
